Chinese Whispers: Did the Early Christians Exaggerate
the Ministry of Jesus Between the Time of Jesus'
Death and the Writing of the Gospels?

© Spotlight Ministries, 2003
www.spotlightministries.org.uk





Critics of the Gospels sometimes declare that they believe that the time between the death of Jesus (appx. 33 A.D.) and the date of the actual writing of the Gospels (appx. between 60 A.D. - 90 A.D.) allowed time for exaggeration and elaboration to creep in. Critics will say it is something like Chinese whispers. One person says one which in turn is passed on to someone else. They in turn pass this on to another and more elaboration is added on, and so on and so fourth. The end result is that the original story has been greatly changed. Is there any weight to this argument? A look at some of the evidences in support of the reliability of the Gospel texts show that there are actually many very good reasons for believing them to be accurate representations of the life of Jesus just as it happened.



Bibliography

Copan, P. "True for you but not for Me." Minnesota: Bethany House Publishers, 1998.

Green, M. (ed.). The Truth of God Incarnate. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1977.


I must also give credit to the web page below for some of the information in this article:

Related Articles (external links):

The Real Jesus of History by Joel Stephen Williams.



















| Home Page | Religious Groups | The New Age Movement | The Occult, Wicca, Witchcraft, Paganism, etc. | Apologetics | Theology | Spiritual Abuse | Ethics & Issues | Links to Other Sites |